Monday, April 20, 2015

The Economics of Electronic Dance Music Festivals

SmartAsset
March 27, 2015
By Thierry Godard 

DJ Shadow stated in late 2012 that “we are livening in a musical renaissance.” In that same year the genre commonly known as electronic dance music was valued at an estimated $4 billion worldwide. 2012 also saw the establishment of The Association For Electronic Music, the first new lobbying group in over 50 years. The last was formed in 1958 for country music. One year later dance music legends Daft Punk, who rose to super stardom by reintroducing Chicago house music to the world, broke Spotify’s streaming record with 27 million plays of their hit single  “Get Lucky.”

The growth of EDM would be virtually impossible without the internet. Similar to book publishing, the web has completely and thoroughly disrupted the music industry. Anyone and everyone with a fairly decent internet connection is only milliseconds away from a millenia’s  worth of musical knowledge.

Through Pandora, Spotify, Soundcloud, Twitter and Facebook we’ve all become  DJ’s; discovering, curating, mixing a set list to carry us through the splendid banality of our technology driven lives. It’s during this great moment of musical re-exploration that everyone seems to have fallen in love with electronic music, dance music, or EDM. Ask anyone and they can tell you at least one electronic music producer, or DJ  that they love, or love to hate.
EDM is, unapologetically, the music of the millenial generation. A generation which has witnessed the greatest technological upheaval since the industrial revolution. A generation that is simultaneously more connected to each other, and seemingly more detached from reality than ever before. It’s the music of 20-30 years old’s who’ve been focused on the rapidly approaching future, while remaining conscious of their past. And despite being more educated than any generation that preceded them, millennials are more than likely to earn less over the course of their professional careers than their parents.
Where baby boomers had rock and roll, and Gen X’ers had hip hop and punk to work out their longing for rebellion and personal freedom, millenials have EDM.  It’s a somewhat ironic mass revolt against modern society, where subtlety  is exchanged for a sense of community that Facebook and Twitter have only dreamed of replicating.
The acceptance of EDM into the cultural mainstream allowed the 10 highest paid DJs to command a combined $115 million in  2012 according to Forbes. The highest paid DJ on the Forbes list, Tiesto who brought in a whopping $22 million last year, attributes the much of electronic music’s growth to social media.
It’s a match made in heaven where unknown DJs and producers are able to share their tracks, remixes and sets across social media, forums, and blogs. This exposure can often lead to paid gigs which have the potential to catapult obscure producers into international super-stardom. Though electronic music has grown popular, its roots still remain deeply entrenched in underground culture.
The rising popularity of electronic music has led to it transforming seemingly overnight from a fringe genre generally associated with LSD, ecstasy, abandoned warehouse parties, and homosexuality, to over the top spectaculars brimming with sensory overload of every kind. 
In the process week long festivals like Ultra Music Festival, Electric Daisy Carnival and Coachella have become household mega-brands. Their economic viability is very real; just one weekend can generate hundreds of millions of dollars for local economies and promoters. Although some events and promoters have close to 20 years of experience, the real acceleration only occurred in the last half decade.
What is even more peculiar is that electronic dance music is nothing new. What we commonly identify as EDM has been around for nearly 45 years, yet it has only recently been acknowledged as the way forward for the struggling music industry.

The rise of electronic dance music

The simplest definition of electronic dance music is music produced primarily, or solely, through synthesizers, drum machines and computers for consumption by party-goers. The earliest elements of electronic dance music began to take shape in the late 1950’s with primitive synthesizers built by the Electronic Music Studios London. Throughout the 1960’s and 1970’s many musicians and bands experimented with various forms of synthesizers like the Moog. But the synthesizer didn’t get its first real moment until 1973 when an Electronic Music Studios VCS 3 appeared on Pink Floyd’s “Dark Side of the Moon.” Electronic dance music as we know it today didn’t really begin to take form until the late 1970’s.
If you said electronic dance music began on  July 12, 1979 during “Disco Demolition Night” at Chicago’s Comiskey Park, you wouldn’t be wrong.  In center field, in between  the Detroit Tigers and Chicago White Sox’s doubleheader is where disco had a very public death.
That night Chicago radio DJ Steve Dahl had rallied his listeners to blow up disco records in a publicity stunt to “kill disco once and for all.” The seemingly harmless promotional stunt, quickly escalated into a full blown riot leading to the cancellation of the second game. The event is viewed to this day as a backlash against inner city homosexuals,  Latin Americans and blacks by most historians and sociologists.
Following the public display of hatred, disco went underground, and into the warehouses of Chicago, and New York. There on the converted dance floors legendary DJs Larry Levan, and Frankie Knuckles played for hours on end mixing together rock, funk, r&b and disco. As the parties grew, DJs quickly began to create their own edits and remixes of classic records to keep warehouse crowds going all night.
By 1984 DJs like Jesse Saunders and Vince Lawrence had begun to create their very own productions like “On and On” to spice up their routines. Eventually record store owners would dub this new style of music “warehouse music” (named after Chicago’s “The Warehouse” where Frankie Knuckles was the resident DJ)  and later shortened to simply “house music.” There in the sweaty inner-city underbelly, people came together as one to dance away the social ills, writhing and twisting until sunrise to house music.
Though house music (Chicago and New York) and techno (Detroit) were born in the United States, it wasn’t until it was exported to the U.K. club scene that it began to become more than just music played in clubs. In Europe it found an audience receptive to forward thinking DJs and their addictive baslines. But when London club nights quickly grew out of control, they were shut down.
Undeterred by law enforcement,  the parties didn’t stop. They simply moved to a empty fields off of the M25, the 117 mile loop of highway that circles London, and quadrupled in size. These open air events quickly gave rise to rave culture, and a series of festivals.  All of which came to a head in 1988’s, and 1989’s “Second Summer of Love.”
From the late 1980’s through the 1990’s the U.K rave scene exploded as parties grew in attendance from4,000,  to anywhere between 25,000and 40,000. Though police and public official tried desperately to shut down the events, it only forced the parties further underground. As such organizers and party goers would rely on increasingly sophisticated methods of communication to relay information on parties. Initially relying on pay phones, and later internet chat rooms and forums.
The birth, and rapid expansion of electronic dance music, and all of its various sub-genres can not be summarized in a few short paragraphs. That’s what books are for. 

Electronic dance music and the internet

With its underground parties, secret locations and word of mouth communication, EDM and the internet were made for each other. It would be the internet that would serve as the catalyst for the explosion to come.   As internet speeds increased, MP3 players proliferated school yards and file sharing networks sprung up like weeds, dance music slowly  began to reintroduce itself to Americans.
These advancements were further compounded by the establishment of digital radio stations like DI.FM (founded in a Binghampton University dorm room), Napster (founded in a Michigan University dorm room) and the emergence of social networks like Myspace (founded by Tom). This perfect storm allowed artists and DJs to instantly distribute their creations. In fact Los Angeles based electronic music Flying Lotus credits the growth of his own career to Myspace.
For Americans, who were continuously subjected to the monochromatic sounds of popular radio, the internet provided an escape. Streaming through computer speakers, often at appallingly low quality, was an endless sea of new sounds, textures and beats played in steady 4/4 time. Anything and everything was game as long as the tempo ranged from 118 to 160 Beats Per Minute.
What came along with the rising interest in electronic music was an interest in DJ’s who hosted internet radio shows. Legends like Armin Van Buuren, Tiesto, Paul Oakenfold, and John Digweed all hosted their own radio shows for traditional radio. However for the first time they made their sets available for streaming or download via the internet.  They had effectively created podcasts before there was an iPod, or iTunes. This new distribution channel helped grow Armin Van Buuren’s A State of Trance into a massive franchise. On March 30th 2013 the weekly radio show celebrated its600th episode to a sold out crowd of 13,500 fans at Madison Square Garden.
The internet and EDM remain joined at the hip, today social media is the primary ticket sales for electronic dance music festivals, concerts and club nights. According to a report by TicketFly, social media ticket sales for EDM events are six times higher than “traditional events” like plays, sporting and other music events.
What is more interesting is that 58% of ticket buyers are usually males purchasing just one ticket. TicketFly speculates that the sense of community among EDM fans decreases desires to pair up prior to purchasing a ticket. This has the effect of increased ticket sales relative to the overall popularity of the performers.

The rise of electronic dance music festivals

North America has had an on-again off-again relationship with music festivals. The latest chapter began in 1999 with Woodstock 99. That summer also hosted the very first Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival. In the time since, numerous music festivals have sprung up in New York, Chicago, LA, Florida, Oregon and Tennessee. The growth in popularity of music festivals is no doubt helped by the internet. A network of blogs, media outlets, promoters and retailers helps facilitates the sale of tickets, and spread awareness (aka hype) about festivals and performing artists.
Like any business, Coachella fought hard to stay alive in its first years, and was cancelled in 2000 due to financial problems. Yet it remains one of the premier music festivals in North America. In 2012 and 2013 the festival generated over  $47 million in revenue. Electronic and dance music acts were the major attractions, with over 50 electronic musicians playing to the pulsating  California desert crowd.
Coachella remains incredibly popular, and is likely the greatest coalescence of current music tastes in the United States. But Coachella is more than just a cultural haven, it generated some very real economic benefits for its hosts. In 2013 the festival generated roughly $500,000 in cold hard cash, or roughly $2.33 per pass sold, for the city of Indio, California. The economic impact of Coachella on the surrounding local economy is an estimated $254 million and is projected to grow for 2014.
The growth of music festivals isn’t limited to Coachella, Bonaroo or Lollapalooza. LiveNation, the largest concert promoter in the world,  views electronic dance music festivals as it’s greatest growth opportunity. In 2012 the promotion powerhouse raked in $3.9 billion and acquired a 90% stake in two EDM festival organizers: U.K. based Cream Holdings Ltd, and Los Angeles’  HARD Events.
Though LiveNation did not reveal the details of these acquisitions, Cream Holdings Ltd had an estimated $7.8 million in assets in 2011 according to the New York Times. This pales in comparison to the estimated $50 million paid by LiveNation to Insomniac Events for a 50% stake in the Electric Daisy Carnival (EDC) organizer. Both Cream Holdings Ltd (which organizes the famed Creamfields Festival in the U.K.) and Insomniac Events are established players in the electronic music scene, having staged events since 1993 and 1998 respectively.
In 2011 Insomniac Events commissioned Beacon Economics to measure its impact on the cities who so graciously hosted their non-stop dance festivals. Beacon estimated that EDC 2010, held at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum, generated roughly $42 million for the local economy over the course of two days. In 2011 the festival moved to the Las Vegas Motor Speedway and expanded its line up to three days. There the festival supported an estimated 1,400 full-time jobs and  generated $136.4 million for the Las Vegas economy.
As impressive as those numbers are, EDC 2012 was even more profitable. Over the course of three days the festival generated $207.048 million for the Las Vegas metro area, an increase of 57% from 2011. It also helped to support the equivalent of 2,018 full time jobs and over $84 million in labor income. EDC is a very big deal for Clark County, in the two years it has played host to EDC the unemployment rate has hovered around 11.8%.
Where is all of that cash coming from? Beacon says 108,000 of the festival’s 115,000 attendees  arrived from other parts of the world and spent millions eating, dancing, drinking and occasionally sleeping in the surrounding area. To date Insomniac claims that they’ve generated $344.246 million for the local economy, which excludes EDC 2013. We estimate that the economic impact of the festival will be in excess of $500 million for 2013.
To get a better sense of the immense growth of electronic dance music festivals, we’ll have to go to Canada for the The Monster Center of Gravity Festival (COG). COG is a music and extreme sports festival hosted in British Columbia with humble beginnings similar to those of Coachella. However it only began to book electronic acts in 2009. Their growth over the last four years is hard evidence of EDM’s acceleration into a business powerhouse capable of producing real financial returns for event producers of all sizes.
The Monster Center of Gravity Festival, organized by WetApe and hosted on Lake Okanagan, is a three day sports and music event/summer camp. Though dwarfed in size by American music festivals like Electric Daisy Carnival and Ultra Music Festival, COG still lists big name DJs like Kaskade and Tiesto as headliners for its 72 hour party.
“Wet Ape was founded in 2007 when some friends and I put together VolleyFest, all we had was a budget of $50,000 and the desire to have fun. Things sort of grew organically from there.”  Said Center of Gravity Event Director Scott Emslie. In 2009 Center of Gravity began to invite EDM DJ’s to the lakeside venue and hasn’t looked back.
Over the last four years the festival has grown in tandem with the electronic music scene. The budget for the 2013 Monster Center of Gravity Festival is an estimated $1.5 million which will go towards hosting 50 artists and six sporting events. It’s a massive logistical undertaking with over500 individuals working behind the scenes.
The Center of Gravity Festival really began to take its current form three years ago. And since then its ticket prices have increased by 81% for a three day pass. That increase, says Emslie “is largely attributed to an increase in the size of the festival.COG simply offers more to attendees than it did three years ago.” With that comes an increased need for security and emergency respondents.  This year COG will  spend roughly $70,000 in contracting local law enforcement to maintain order.
The increased ticket prices also help to fund significantly improved stages, lighting and sound. Emslie added “People just want more, and the greater number of festivals has increased competition to provide bigger and better shows each year. For example we booked Calvin Harris, Deadmau5 and Skrillex for our 2010 festival. Back then Skrillex was basically unknown and we paid him a couple thousand to show up.  When we tried to book him again five months later [for 2011] he had become so in demand that it didn’t make financial sense [for us] to have him play” said Emslie.  Despite the festival’s impressive growth, it still cannot match the ferocious demand of fans to see big name DJs play at huge festivals.

Future music: mo’ money mo’ problems

It doesn’t take much math to see that the costs of staging a festivals like COG and New York’s Electronic Zoo are immense. Yet its ticket prices are less than half of Miami’s Ultra Music Festival, which offers multiple day passes for $399 and VIP access starting at $850. What Scott Emslie was quick to reiterate was that rising costs are attributed directly to the rising costs of booking in demand DJs, producing fantastic visual shows, and making sure the sound is impeccable.
The promoters at Ultra Music Festival are conscious of the rising costs, and have introduced a payment plan for it’s pricey tickets. So even if you can’t afford to buy your tickets today, you can put your desire to rage on layaway. Which isn’t as terrible of an idea as it sounds.
Miami is another struggling city that has reaped the benefits of the EDM festival boom. The south Florida city  has hosted the Winter Music Conference for 28 years, of which Ultra Music Festival is one of the 500 events underway over the course of ten day days. In just one weekend Ultra, and its165,000 attendees, generated $79 million in revenue for the Miame-Dade county economy. It also put $10 million in taxes into the coffers of  state and local governments.
As a recent lawsuit filed against Insomniac Events CEO Pasqual Rotell highlighted, not all of revenue generated passes on to the state through legal means. For Rotell, some of it goes towards greasing the palms of a Los Angeles coliseum officials to the tune of $1.8 million. The case was dismissed, but it does illustrate the very grown up problems festival producers are dealing with as pressure to put on more expensive and more impressive shows increases.
Though EDM, and EDM festivals have proven to be as economically viable as any other form of music, it still has many detractors.  There are many within its own ranks who dismiss the sudden popularity as a trend, or passing fad. Though they aren’t wrong, the insane salaries commanded by superstar DJs is nothing more than the market responding to years of pent up demand. People have always loved dance music, and for the first time it seems like it’s acceptable for Americans to be upfront about it.
It’s entirely possible that electronic dance music won’t remain as popular as it is today. But for an industry determined to not be forgotten by history, continued growth remains the only option. For a a country (and a generation) still coming to terms with its penchant for racism, homophobia, sexism and rabid consumerism, there couldn’t be a more appropriate time for America to pop the EDM pill.
Are you fan of EDM? Share the growth with your friends!
(originally posted at https://smartasset.com/insights/the-economics-of-electronic-dance-music-festivals)

Friday, April 17, 2015

How to Protect Your Phone From the Police!!

Another wonderful wealth of information from our dear friend && mentor ... (fyi - if you are in California and need a lawyer - this man is the man!) ... Watch this short, informative video below produced by the Festival Lawyer ... then read on below for more in depth info!! ... 

Your EDM
April 15, 2015
By The Festival Lawyer
((I am a criminal defense attorney with the firm Valencia, Ippolito and Bowman in San Jose, California, I am not only a former prosecutor but a former DJ and drummer and an avid festival goer.))

STEP ONE  – KNOW YOUR RIGHTS

 “THIS IS A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT……WITH GUITAR…”
Know Your Rights – The Clash

A negative encounter  with a police officer can become a tense and scary situation if not handled correctly. It’s important to stay calm and not escalate the situation. Learning and then politely using a few key  legal phrases can make it much easier for you to stand up for your rights. But before you can enforce your rights, you have to know what they are. Or to put it another way:

“As a practical matter, not knowing your rights and not having any rights are the same thing.”Festival Lawyer 2015

Last June, in a case called  Riley v. California, the Supreme Court gave everyone an important new 4th Amendment right that  they may not know about. The Riley court ruled  that the police now are required to get a search warrant before they can search a suspect’s cell phone after arrest.

Now normally, the police  don’t need a search warrant to go through your   property  after you have been arrested. Legally speaking, the idea is that you’ve  given up your normal privacy rights since you are on your way to jail.  Also, law enforcement needs to check you for weapons and make sure you don’t have evidence that can be destroyed. A warrantless search like this is  called a,  “Search incident to arrest.” Up until the Supreme Court’s ruling in Riley, a lot of  courts took the position that cell phones were covered under this “Incident to arrest”  exception. These courts ruled that  there was no real difference between a person’s cell phone and a wallet or purse and officers were allowed to search them all without a search warrant.

On the other hand, some courts took the position that cellphones are more like mini computers. Police are generally required to get a search warrant before searching the contents of a home computer. This is  due to the extremely private nature of the information housed on them.

In Riley, the  Supreme Court sided  with privacy advocates and civil libertarians on this issue.  Because of the sensitive private matters that might be on a person’s phone, the Supreme court ruled that  it is more appropriate to  require the police to get a warrant before searching them.   ( (PS,   don’t act like you don’t know what I’m talking about when I say “sensitive private matters”….  Most of you wouldn’t let your spouse or friends go through your cellphone let alone a police officer!!)

As Chief Justice Roberts explained  in the court’s decision: 
Modern cellphones are not just another technological convenience….With all they contain and all they may reveal they hold for many, ‘the privacies of life.”  The fact that the the cell phones are mobile doesn’t change the fact that this is exactly the type of private information the 4th Amendment is meant to protect.”
For police looking to search a suspect’s cell phone, Roberts had one simple instruction:
“Our answer to the question of what police must do before they search a cell phone seized incident to an arrest is accordingly simple – get a warrant.”

STEP TWO –  DOWNLOAD THE  “I DO NOT CONSENT TO A SEARCH OF THIS PHONE”  LOCK SCREEN 

Okay so now that you know that you have a new constitutional right, how do you go about protecting it? It’s important to realize that most of the time, cops don’t want to bother with getting a search warrant for a phone. Instead, they will normally just ask the owner to give them permission to search it.

Therefore the simplest tip I can give you is to  NEVER give the police permission to search your phone.

I can hear you saying, Never?!  Really? Never? …As in never ever?

Yes, never ever. Or to paraphrase Nigel Tufnel, “None more never”

The  Supreme Court has ruled that it is your absolute and complete right to say “NO’ to a search of a phone. So, a police officer who asks you  for permission to search your phone is basically saying, “Hi, mind if I violate your Constitutional Rights by rummaging through your personal property ?”

Remember, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Riley specifically addresses searches performed during an arrest.  So if you are not under arrest – say you got pulled over for a traffic citation – then the police have even less right to search your phone.

The important point is that if you give the police permission to search your cell phone you can’t later go back and argue about their actions. You’ve waived your right to object. On the other hand, If you refuse, the police can still search the phone, but now they have to justify their search to a judge and show they have probable cause for the search.

That’s why, legally speaking, there  is just no good reason for you to agree to ever let the police go on a “fishing expedition” of ANY of your personal property.

If you are asked if you consent to a search, say clearly and firmly

I DO NOT CONSENT TO A SEARCH OF THIS PHONE” 

People sometimes worry that saying no to a police officer is going to make them “Look guilty.”   But If the police are detaining or arresting you,how it looks is really the least of your problems. As  the great Saul Goodman put it,
“It’s getting arrested that makes you look guilty”

As I mentioned in the article, it is super nerve racking remembering what to do and say in an encounter with the police. Therefore we’ve created a lock screen with some of the key legal phrases  you may need in a police encounter available as a download lock screen here


STEP THREE –  ADD A PASSWORD TO YOUR PHONE FOR EXTRA SAFETY

As an additional protection, I  recommend adding a password to your phone. Under the 5th Amendment of the Constitution you have a right not to incriminate yourself.  If the police ask you for your password or try to force you to reveal your PIN, that may end up violating your right against self-incrimination.

The law in this area is a little tricky. You see, the right against self-incrimination says that you can’t be forced to testify against yourself. But courts have ruled that you can  be forced to give physical evidence against yourself, like giving a DNA sample or a voice examplar.

That’s  why the police are allowed to force a suspect to stand in a physical lineup and say “Hand me the keys you f*cking c*cksuckers”  with a bunch of other “Usual Suspects” without running into a 5th Amendment issue.   (Unedited, super unsafe for work language scene here..)

I  suggest adding a password to your phone rather than just going with a fingerprint ID because of this potential issue.  It’s not that there  is anything wrong with a fingerprint ID. In fact, they are wonderfully convenient.  However,  at least one court out there has ruled  that forcing a suspect to  use their fingerprint to open a phone doesn’t constitute “testimony” and therefore doesn’t implicate the  5th Amendment.

As the court wrote: 
In this case, the defendant cannot be compelled to produce his passcode to access his smartphone, but he can be compelled to produce his fingerprint to do the same.”
A copy of the opinion as well as a good  summary of the law in this area can be found  here: http://mashable.com/2014/10/30/cops-can-force-you-to-unlock-phone-with-fingerprint-ruling/


STEP FOUR  – LEARN TO RECORD THE POLICE SAFELY

As always, YOU are always in the best position to know what to do in a particular situation legally and practically speaking  given all the facts and the law of your jurisdiction. This is particularly true when it comes to the issue of recording the police.

On the one hand,  recording the police is easily  the most effective way to document a bad encounter with  them.  Recording a bad interaction preserves the truth of what happened and can provide evidence for your lawyer if you have to go to court later. I have personally seen clients exonerated through the use of cellphone footage on numerous  prior occasions.

On the other hand, the decision to  start recording a police officer can seriously  inflame an already  tense situation.  Officers who see a recording device may feel their authority is being challenged in some way.

Police officers have a great deal of discretion as to who they arrest and why. In the court system, attorneys sometimes  use the term, “contempt of cop” to describe a situation where an officer arrests someone for a charge like “interfering with an arrest” or “drunk in public” for essentially failing the attitude test with the officer. Your personal assessment of when to start recording the police is going to depend on a lot of factors including your own comfort level and the nature of your encounter. But it’s important to get the  legal knowledge ahead of that decision. That way when you do record, you know how to do so legally and safely.

The always great Steve Silverman of flexyourrights.org has an excellent video on what you need to know legally and practically before video taping a police encounter.


Step 5 – DOWNLOAD A STREAMING APP FOR YOUR PHONE

 Okay, so you have done your research in Step 4. If you do you choose to video record the police, you will also want to download  a streaming application.That way, you don’t have to worry about the police confiscating your phone or your evidence being lost or destroyed in some manner. Flex Your Rights as well as copblock.org recommendBambuser for this purpose. Bambuser is an mobile video streaming platform that allows users to stream and share live video using your smart phone.

I found Bambuser very easy to download and use. It allows you to either stream “live” or save for later uploading, allows you to broadcast in public or private,and share to most social networks easily.

Bambuser:Cost: Free 
DownloadAndroid
DownloadiOS

I’ve also heard good things about this streaming app 
FiVo FilmCost: $1.99
DownloadAndroid,
Download:  iOS

FINAL POINTS  – LEGAL DISCLAIMER

Reminder. I am an attorney but I am not YOUR attorney. Nothing here should make you think that I am giving you legal advice or that I am establishing an attorney-client relationship. The point of these articles and videos is to get you started on learning the law for yourself. Now go take action. Lock down your phone and make it “Fest Law Approved.” Be sure to tell your festival buddies .

As always, If you have ideas on how to share this information or how to improve the next video please  contact me at @ info@festivallawyer.com
#besafehavefun

(originally posted at http://www.youredm.com/2015/04/15/the-festival-lawyer-on-how-to-protect-your-phone-from-the-police/)